Posts Tagged ‘Angular’
Facebook is not the only one to use React:
Instagram is 100% built on React, both public site and internal tools ;
Yahoo`s mail client is made in React;
Netflix – the biggest paid video-streaming service;
Sberbank, bank #1 in Russia, is built with React;
Khan Academy uses React for most new JS development.
React in comparison to Angular.js isn`t a complete framework. However we can`t say that React.js is only “V” in the MVC. After a closer look, you can actually see that React.js is more than just “V”, it has quite some features of the C (controller) part as well. This is why React is so confusing to understand.
Let`s see why React.js stands out from the crowd:
Flux – is highly competitive to MVC. One-way data flow provides maintainability and efficient arrangement of data and DOM elements.
React developers suggested using “virtual DOM” in order to solve performance issue for websites with too dynamic DOM. All changes in a document are made there first, and then React looks for the shortest path to apply them in a real DOM tree. This approach makes the framework fast.
React is fundamentally different than other front-end frameworks in that each asset is made up of many isolated components. Want a button changed across the whole platform? Change it once and voilà it`s changed everywhere.
By making the creation, distribution and consumption of isolated reusable components more straightforward, developers are better able to save time by using and creating common abstractions. This is true of both low level elements like buttons and high level elements such as accordions.
Business Development Manager
Professional Software Development
Posted March 15, 2016on:
Whether you’re building apps for the browser, mobile or desktop, Aurelia can enable you to not only create amazing UI, but do it in a way that is maintainable, testable and extensible.
Retrospective and today
Aurelia is a project of Rob Eisenberg, the author of a very popular MV * – framework for Caliburn.Micro XAML-platforms, Durandal. Understanding all the disadvantages of Durandal, Eisenberg engaged in the development of so-called NextGen framework. In 2014 he began to work in Angular team on the second version of the framework. However, several months later, Rob decided to leave the Angular team since the direction of Angular 2, in his opinion, had changed a lot. He gathered a large team and returned to work on the framework of his dreams. And Aurelia is the result of that work.
By using modern tooling Aurelia was written from the ground up in ECMAScript 2016. This means you have native modules, classes, decorators and more at disposal.
Aurelia’s code is open sourced under the MIT License, a very permissive license used by many popular web projects today. The starter kits are available under the Creative Commons 0 license. There is also a Contributor for those who wish to join the team in working on Aurelia. Ultimately, this means that you can use Aurelia without fear of legal repercussions and it can be build in the same confidence.
Benefits of Aurelia
• Convention over Configuration – Simple conventions help developers follow solid patterns and reduce the amount of code they have to write and maintain. It also means less fiddling with framework APIs and more focus on their app.
• Simple, But Not Simplistic – Because of the simple design developers are able to learn a very small set of patterns and APIs that unlock limitless possibilities.
• Promotes the “-ilities” – Testability, maintainability, extensibility, learnability, etc.- Aurelia’s design helps developers to naturally write code that exhibits these desirable characteristics.
• Amazingly Extensible – Aurelia is highly modular and designed to be customized easily, so developers will never hit a roadblock or have to “hack” the framework to succeed.
• Integrates Well with Others – Easily integrated with any 3rd party library or framework: for instance, with jQuery, React, Polymer, Bootstrap, MaterializeCSS and much more.
• TypeScript Support – Each Aurelia library is released with its own d.ts files. There are also official TypeScript beginner kits and production quality starter kits.
• An Official Product with Commercial Support – Being an official product of Durandal Inc., it has commercial and enterprise support available, so you can use Aurelia for building core technology for your business.
Aurelia, Angular and React.js – what’s common and what’s different?
Aurelia vs. Angular
Similarities between Aurelia and Angular 2:
Differences in vision details and options range:
Aurelia vs. React.js
Aurelia vs. Angular and React
It goes without saying why these three frameworks are so popular. They all have a lot of strong advantages. Eventually, I’m favoring Aurelia: there’s solid documentation available and the overall philosophy is the same with Angular 2, but Aurelia is a better choice from the syntax and execution point of view. The architecture and syntax vision of Aurelia team seems to be more clear than the vision of the Angular team. The company and enterprise support of Aurelia is also a big pro.
What is your personal experience with these frameworks? Which one would you choose for your projects and why? What’s your prediction “who” will win the crown in the nearest future? Please feel free to share your thoughts with us.
Thank you in advance!
Business Development Manager
Professional Software Development
- Ideal for complex “client-side” applications, where the complexity is more in a way “components” of an application interacts with each other than in a way they synchronise and/or interact with backend
- Very clear separation of concerns
- Uses concepts that kind of look like the future of HTML/DOM (DOM templates, binding attributes).
- A bit complicated to grasp. A lot of new concepts
- jQuery or another dom parsing framework in directives may be painful to use because of the way angular compiles templates
- Good for application with a big level of complexity on the client side, but you’ll have to learn a lot of new stuff.
On the whole, AngularJS is a robust and viable framework for building generic web apps. Whether it lives up to the expectations of being the most dominant JS framework for web development is yet to be seen.
Backbone came out in June 2010, and its community is nearly as large as Angular’s. Many popular applications such as Twitter, LinkedIn Mobile and Foursquare use Backbone framework. Also a number of music apps were built with Backbone, including well-known Pandora, Soundcloud and Pitchfork.
If you’re working on a single-page application or widget and you’re comfortable with being a self-starter—Backbone is likely the right choice for you.
- Very easy to start with
- Very small
- Free to use any templating engine
- A lot of excellent documentation
- Good Community Support
- Very popular (According to Github, Stackoverflow statistics)
- Very flexible in how you may want to use it
- Minimalist library
- Easy to learn
- No two way data-binding
- Dependency on different frameworks like jQuery and Underscore
- No provision for handling nested views
- More work required to build large scale applications as compared to Angular or Ember
- Code can become messy
- DOM manipulations are left to the developer
- Performs slower than AngularJS
Ember is the newest of the three, but it’s already making waves. LivingSocial, Groupon, Zendesk, Discourse and Square are some of the most well-known applications that have adopted Ember. Ember’s creators say it’s easy to see when a site is using Ember because of its loading speed.
Ember’s library size and support network are its two greatest strengths, but if you’re only trying to create a small widget or single-page app, it might be overkill for you. If you’re working on a multipage, navigational, long-term project, Ember might be the right choice for you.
- Good for long running and complex applications with deep nested view hierarchies
- Aggregates model data changes and update the DOM late in the RunLoop
- Well defined models and computed properties
- Use HandleBars as templating which is flexible
- Provides auto updating computed properties
- Test driven
- Relatively new framework
- Steepest learning curve out of the three
- Payload is the largest out of all three
- Dependency on jQuery and Handlebars
- Poor performance as compared to AngularJS
- Documentation is not very good
- Two way bindings are not implemented well